Let's See How COVID-19 Vaccine Papers Can Be Misleading
Don't Use Bad Science To Push More RNA
"A colleague and friend asked me what I thought of a recent publication. For the benefit of others, I will provide a critique of it here. Why is this important?
Because it shows people how to differentiate the experts they should be listening to from those who stand on a foundation of fatally flawed science.
The paper is entitled “Repetitive mRNA vaccination is required to improve the quality of broad-spectrum anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the absence of CXCL13”, and it can be found here (Da Silva, et al., 2023).
The paper assesses antibody responses ...
[Reminder: Antibody responses are a surrogate, and prove nothing about immunity. They merely suggest.]
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/lets-see-how-covid-19-vaccine-papers
Read the comments especially Marc in Calgary.
https://www.smalldeadanimals.com/2025/08/06/are-you-more-of-an-albertan-or-a-big-city-canadian/
Aren't they just wonderful! Her add to post is interesting. I have a son working on a pipeline in B.C. that was approved many years ago that I hadn't heard of as it never makes the news. Previously he worked on Trans Mountain which was major news daily.
https://www.smalldeadanimals.com/2025/08/06/i-want-a-new-country-144/
