Let's See How COVID-19 Vaccine Papers Can Be Misleading
Don't Use Bad Science To Push More RNA
"A colleague and friend asked me what I thought of a recent publication. For the benefit of others, I will provide a critique of it here. Why is this important?
Because it shows people how to differentiate the experts they should be listening to from those who stand on a foundation of fatally flawed science.
The paper is entitled “Repetitive mRNA vaccination is required to improve the quality of broad-spectrum anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the absence of CXCL13”, and it can be found here (Da Silva, et al., 2023).
The paper assesses antibody responses ...
[Reminder: Antibody responses are a surrogate, and prove nothing about immunity. They merely suggest.]
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/lets-see-how-covid-19-vaccine-papers
Dear Liberals, fire the bureaucrats
The Liberals must stop growing the public service and instead find ways to boost the economy
(Really, get off our backs and get out of the way. That's all it would take)
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/fire-the-bureaucrats
Did the RCMP's Indigenous Policing policy derail the Kamloops investigation?
https://wokewatchcanada.substack.com/p/did-the-rcmps-indigenous-policing
