Let's See How COVID-19 Vaccine Papers Can Be Misleading

Don't Use Bad Science To Push More RNA

"A colleague and friend asked me what I thought of a recent publication. For the benefit of others, I will provide a critique of it here. Why is this important?
Because it shows people how to differentiate the experts they should be listening to from those who stand on a foundation of fatally flawed science.
The paper is entitled “Repetitive mRNA vaccination is required to improve the quality of broad-spectrum anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the absence of CXCL13”, and it can be found here (Da Silva, et al., 2023).
The paper assesses antibody responses ...
[Reminder: Antibody responses are a surrogate, and prove nothing about immunity. They merely suggest.]
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/lets-see-how-covid-19-vaccine-papers