Explosive Story: Health Canada Admits Pfizer Misrepresented Their COVID-19 Shot
Is Health Canada now a spreader of 'misinformation'?
This is an admission of epic proportions, coming from Health Canada. One must wonder why Pfizer would not disclose the presence of a biologically functional DNA sequence to a health regulator when it is clearly their responsibility to do so. I suspect that Health Canada is not happy that their rules were not adhered to and that this was only discovered by objective third-party scientists of integrity who worked diligently despite incessant harassment, defamation, and threats.
Notably, Pfizer has been granted legal indemnity for their shots; something which in and of itself should be a major concern. However, an important court ruling was recently made in Michigan, USA. Specifically, the court ruled that a pharmaceutical company’s legal indemnity was null and void for a contaminated version of the medical product. The product, but not any contaminants are subject to the legal indemnity. And failing to disclose a bioactive component would seem to go one step further. You can read an article about the legal issue here.
So, it would follow that Pfizer’s legal indemnity should be null and void for shots that contaminated with bacterial DNA that included a bioactive sequence that was not disclosed to regulatory agencies.
I wonder what people will think knowing that Health Canada has listened to ‘misinformation spreading scientists’, done their own homework, and then confirmed that they were duped by Pfizer.
If Health Canada was duped, then everyone that received a Pfizer shot was duped.
I call this a proof of principle. What other important information might Pfizer have withheld from regulatory agencies? When someone is caught being deceitful, the onus is not on the one deceived to find a way to trust the deceiver again. Rather, the onus is on the deceiver to earn trust back through a slow, methodical, and repetitious cycle.
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/explosive-story-health-canada-admits
From Richmond to Ottawa: Indigenous Land Claims Threaten Private Property Rights Across Canada
The Continuing Perversity of Civil Asset Forfeiture
A Richmond, B.C. man who’s owned his home since 1975 claims he has just been told his mortgage will not be renewed — because the B.C. Supreme Court granted title of his land to the Cowichan Tribe. After nearly 50 years of paying taxes, maintaining his home, and contributing to the community, his lender has informed him that his property no longer qualifies as secure collateral. The reason? His land title is now contested under an Indigenous land claim.
“I’ve owned my land for decades,” he said. “I’m not giving it up without a fight.” The homeowner received the news by letter and said his mortgage company refused renewal due to the uncertainty surrounding ownership. “I paid taxes, I paid for my place. Now, lo and behold, I don’t own it. Not fair.”
The court ruling in B.C. marks a historic precedent — and now it’s ...
Started on FB and everyone is losing their minds over the back to work order for teachers. Even Notley posted. I have been following this before they went out on strike and listened to Shilling blabber and change the story on talk shows. I may offend some but such is life but I don't care what has to happen to get kids back in the school of THEIR choice and stop this insanity. If you work for the taxpayer you should have no right to strike or threaten to in solidarity. I don't know the answer but what has happened for more years than not is not working. Abolish Unions and school boards also as they implement basically what the union wants - not Alberta Ed. Also put the special needs coded kids in their own classrooms all together and not with the ones there to learn. Sorry but if severe they will never learn like the others.
