The Lions
Politics • Culture • Education
A group of friends with mostly centrist or conservative viewpoints who share resources and ideas about the governance of Alberta and Canada and about world events and trends.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
December 05, 2023

Children who reported to pediatric center emergency departments with respiratory illness and were hospitalized were more likely to have taken COVID-19 vaccines,

[Note that this is small sample and there are confounding factors]
"...according to a new study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
More than half of vaccinated children included in the study were admitted to hospitals as inpatients, compared to less than half of unvaccinated children.
The study examined children aged 6 months to 4 years who went to emergency departments at one of seven pediatric medical centers, including Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and Seattle Children's Hospital. Some of the children were admitted to hospitals. The encounters happened as early as July 1, 2022, and as late as Sept. 30, 2023.
The children needed to have one or more symptoms indicating acute respiratory illness, such as fever, cough, or shortness of breath.Vaccinated children were also more likely to receive intensive care, need supplemental oxygen, and die, according to the paper, though just three deaths were recorded among the study population and some of the differences were not statistically significant.
The CDC's media office, which promoted the study, told The Epoch Times in an email: "Although proportionally more hospitalized children had received a COVID-19 vaccine than children enrolled in the emergency department (ED), this does not mean that vaccinated children were more likely to be hospitalized."Dr. Eyal Shahar, an epidemiologist at the University of Arizona who reviewed the study, noted that the vaccinated children had worse underlying health. "That largely explains worse outcomes," Dr. Shahar told The Epoch Times via email. "We cannot attribute the outcomes to vaccination.""This appears to be another substandard observational study of vaccine efficacy in children published without peer review by the CDC. The list of limitations is a mile long and understates the study's methodological limitations," Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of health policy at Stanford University who reviewed the study, told The Epoch Times via email. "If the CDC wants to answer the question of COVID vaccine benefits and harms to children, it should commission a large, rigorous, randomized trial with meaningful clinical endpoints like prevention of hospitalization and death."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/children-with-respiratory-illnesses-at-pediatric-centers-more-likely-to-be-vaccinated-cdc-study-5540063?utm_source=ref_share&utm_campaign=copy

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Posts
18 hours ago

Misclassification of individuals as “unvaccinated” using antibody jargon to mislead the public

If you got 1 dose, you're injected [vaccinated] - a truer representation of MMWR data
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/misclassification-of-individuals

The Epoch Times - Viewpoints, Opinion

Bruce Pardy: Notwithstanding the Charter, Neither Legislatures nor Courts Protect Individual Liberties in Canada

In September, the federal government urged the Supreme Court of Canada to protect rights by limiting the use of the Charter’s “notwithstanding clause.” Two days later, it introduced Bill C-9, the “Combatting Hate Act,” which will infringe upon free speech. The bill does not invoke the notwithstanding clause. It does not need to. The Supreme Court has already done the dirty work by declaring, years ago, that prohibiting “hate speech” is constitutional.

In Canada, who protects individual liberties? Not legislatures. Not courts.

The notwithstanding clause is Section 33 of the Charter. It allows provincial legislatures and Parliament to pass laws that might infringe the rights in Sections 2 and 7 to 15. Invoking the clause prevents courts from striking down the statute as unconstitutional. Activists have long sought to discredit and delegitimize the ...

Mamdani is certainly bad for NYC, but big picture, he might be the best thing possible for Trump/MAGA.

Why? Mamdani is going to give Trump the necessary optics to justify going into NYC and other cities with NG/ICE.

Mamdani personifies the most radical elements of the Left. He is essentially a walking proof that Trump is right about the Democrats and their party’s trajectory.

Mamdani is going to be a walking red-pill machine. He is going to give Trump all the headlines and talking points to justify Trump’s ultimate goal, which is deploying NG/ICE, deporting the illegals, passing voter ID, arresting the treasonous coup-plotters, and saving the Republic.

Mamdani is a gift to Trump and MAGA.

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/mamdani-is-a-gift-to-trump-and-maga

Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals