one need not be right to punish one's enemies, only powerful
[Remind you of the Coutts Four? It should,]
"many folks forwarded me james howard kunstler’s recent piece entitled “Whatever it Takes Won’t be Enough” that got picked up by ZH and in which certain notorious internet felines got a shout out. i found it provocative and insightful, so i’d like to see if i can add to/extend some of his ideas somewhat.
"i think james is very much onto something with this "lawfare" idea of weaponizing courts and judicial process against we the people. this practice seems to have been a soros centerpiece for some time in his push to dominate DA races and judgeships as a cheap way to have big effects, grant license to the favored, and criminalize dissent.
"in a legalistic technocracy such as ours, the power to determine what is and is not investigated and what is and is not charged is the true prerogative of princes.
"it determines who may act abhorrently and who must be always looking over their shoulder for fear of a tap from leviathan.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/the-process-is-the-punishment
I am watching and listening to the Town Hall in Red Deer on X and covering a lot of good questions and panelists. Over 10,000 watching.
I wish the media would honestly cover it but it will be slammed on talk shows and newspapers.
I noticed that our membership is growing so people must be mentioning this group around. Welcome.
We have a few regular posters, but anyone can post, so if you come across something especially worth passing on, please do.
For those who may be new or who have been here for a while and never posted our group enjoys articles and other posts that provide a unique perspective and challenge the common narratives, fill in blanks, or simply entertain.
Readers 'like' some articles more than others, but 'liking' to me is more a sign that we found the article useful than that we agree with it. I often 'like' articles that i thought to be are quirky, off-base, or just plain wrong, but worth reading.