Letter to Friend
It has not actually been proven that all the vaccines prevent the diseases to the extent that people believe. Vaccines are like religion. Fear and hope are the drivers.
Actually it is a religion with dogma, articles of faith, many reported miracles, and saints, too.
The harms are not properly monitored, and when third parties or whistleblowers expose them, the whistleblowers or scientists are muzzled or -- even highly credentialed -- are canceled. Because Science. And because Public Good.
Although some vaccines are proven effective, like maybe rabies, the rest ride through on their coattails and some vaccines have actually caused outbreaks or worse. Polio found in sewers in American cities are apparently from vaccines.
Big Pharma learned a lot from Big Tobacco.
MNR is coming under scrutiny again. It seems the age of administration is a factor, but, additionally, as with farm chemicals, the adjutants added to boost efficacy escape scrutiny and are assumed by regulators to be inert, although they are hardly inert. In the case of vaccines, some are toxic, and especially to some phenotypes. It is inescapable.
The problem is that the harms are random and not reproducible at will.
I leave it to you to search out the many, many highly credible reports of harms and skullduggery. Just don't look for it in the New York Times, unless it can occasionly be found between the lines or by what is not said.
You might find this book (link) interesting. Read a bit, then Google it and see all the attempts to debunk what it reveals.
Follow the money.
Vaccines are big business and Bill Gates was bragging that vaccines were the best investment he ever made. Forget that he has been accused of causing a lot of deaths and paralysis testing on naive populations in undeveloped countries. He made buckets. Again, there are credible widespread reports.
A number of mechanisms of harm have been revealed and have been exposed but remain unreported in the corporate and government sponsored media. Of course some deliberate disinformation has been published, too, to muddy the waters, so you have to have a critical mind and some background to sort it out and rank it on a credibility scale. There is a large cluster around 75-99% probabilty and a scatter going down to and including zero.
Take a trip off the mainstream information highway, and down a few back roads. Once the view is no longer obscured by billboards, the ride is rougher and travel slower, but scenery is very different, and you'll meet some unique, honest, people with clear eyes.
A large number of credible scientists have been blowing the whistle since the start and if you ever read the 140+ page Pfizer study published 2020, you might see things in a different light.
I haven't been sharing since you seemed happy to stay mainstream, but I can send some of the better articles as I come across them, which I do often, if you like.
Berta Dad nailed it. Copied from FB.
Jeff Rath’s behaviour toward Danielle Smith is not a good look for this movement, and he does not speak for me.
When this started, I had respect for him. But as this has played out, it has become harder to ignore what appears to be a push for power inside the movement, not a sincere focus on Alberta independence.
Danielle Smith is a major reason Albertans were even able to collect signatures in the first place. Compared to any other premier in this country, I believe she has been the strongest one standing up for her province.
I will not forget her accomplishments.
She stood up for parental rights when others wanted schools keeping parents in the dark.
She took action against political ideology being pushed in classrooms.
She made sure kids got back to school when the system tried to hold families hostage.
She has strengthened Alberta Sheriffs and continued exploring ways to free Alberta from relying on the RCMP.
And that is only part of it.
This ...
WEF/UN/Globalists have proven they can’t be trusted now given the key to Canada. Are you awake yet Canadians??
REPORT: UN Climate Scientists Flip on the Climate Doomsday Narrative | Stand on Guard CLIP
WATCH Have they been lying about climate change this whole time? Are they cancelling climate change doomsday scenario for the data centers?
The UN climate scientists admit the high emission doomsday scenarios were overblown. UN climate change scientists flip: climate change not too bad anymore according to a new report. No doomsday on the horizon.
On this Stand on Guard clip, we question why the UN might be backtracking on previous dire predictions, suggesting a new agenda at play. We examine how this shift could be tied to the proliferation of data center construction and the increasing demands on our power grid from artificial intelligence. It's crucial to consider the broader implications for our communities and hold big tech accountable.
Thank you to @jimmy_dore for pointing out this...
