A report from the Department of Works blames poor federal management for the hiring of costly consultants, per Blacklock’s Reporter.
The report follows evidence disclosing a typical government employee now answers to seven levels of management.
“While value for money and cost effectiveness is perceived by the majority of consulting service users, the Evaluation notes in some instances insufficient preparation and planning may have limited the cost effectiveness,” said the report.
Cabinet to date has failed to reach promised cuts in spending on consulting now worth $21.6 billion annually. Consultants are only to be hired for specialized work that cannot be done by employees. The report found managers often never bothered to find out.
“While the Evaluation found insufficient internal resources was one of the most common reasons provided for seeking a contract for services, evidence collected as part of this Evaluation presented a low level of awareness and consideration by departmental teams regarding the use of other human resource options,” said the report.
Managers also justified hiring consultants as a cost savings for taxpayers though a third admitted they didn’t know, said the report.
“Management frequently agrees the vendor selected represented the best value for the work completed,” it said.
“The Evaluation found 64% of survey respondents agreed the selection criteria used for their contracts resulted in a vendor representing the best value for money while 36% did not know.”
Spending on consultants has ballooned despite an increase in federal payroll costs to $67.4 billion a year. The Budget Office in a February 22 report counted 428,000 federal employees.
“It is not uncommon for departments to have five levels of executives and associate deputy ministers or more and one deputy minister,” Budget Officer Yves Giroux testified March 18 at the Commons Government Operations Committee.
“It leads to a situation where an employee can have seven levels of management above them.”
“There is certainly room for ‘de-layering’ as some would call it. Yes, there is room to reduce some levels of executives in the public service.”
“Over time we are seeing an increase in the number of public servants, in public expenditures, but year after year, despite the fact departments choose their performance indicators and the targets, they don’t seem to be getting significantly better. That is what worries me with the increased level of spending.”
https://www.westernstandard.news/news/works-department-blames-bloated-bureaucracy-bad-management-for-the-hiring-of-costly-consultants/55984
Berta Dad nailed it. Copied from FB.
Jeff Rath’s behaviour toward Danielle Smith is not a good look for this movement, and he does not speak for me.
When this started, I had respect for him. But as this has played out, it has become harder to ignore what appears to be a push for power inside the movement, not a sincere focus on Alberta independence.
Danielle Smith is a major reason Albertans were even able to collect signatures in the first place. Compared to any other premier in this country, I believe she has been the strongest one standing up for her province.
I will not forget her accomplishments.
She stood up for parental rights when others wanted schools keeping parents in the dark.
She took action against political ideology being pushed in classrooms.
She made sure kids got back to school when the system tried to hold families hostage.
She has strengthened Alberta Sheriffs and continued exploring ways to free Alberta from relying on the RCMP.
And that is only part of it.
This ...
WEF/UN/Globalists have proven they can’t be trusted now given the key to Canada. Are you awake yet Canadians??
REPORT: UN Climate Scientists Flip on the Climate Doomsday Narrative | Stand on Guard CLIP
WATCH Have they been lying about climate change this whole time? Are they cancelling climate change doomsday scenario for the data centers?
The UN climate scientists admit the high emission doomsday scenarios were overblown. UN climate change scientists flip: climate change not too bad anymore according to a new report. No doomsday on the horizon.
On this Stand on Guard clip, we question why the UN might be backtracking on previous dire predictions, suggesting a new agenda at play. We examine how this shift could be tied to the proliferation of data center construction and the increasing demands on our power grid from artificial intelligence. It's crucial to consider the broader implications for our communities and hold big tech accountable.
Thank you to @jimmy_dore for pointing out this...
Listening to Ganum today on the meeting that Premier Smith is having with Lukasek I am wondering why not just have his referendum on the vote in October? If enough say no to his question isn't it the same as a referendum that the other side wants? I for one want this to wake up the East and don't care how it happens. Another caller said she needs to call an provincial election in October and take the rest of questions off the ballot - this could be risky but I am leaning toward it as terrified that the NDP will get in again and right now Nemshi is their handicap IMHO.
