From the ecomments:
Dr. K
6 hrs ago
Robert, About the best single piece I have seen on this at this point. You got everything. But as a physician, you might want to point out that they report that the shooter had no ID on him, but in under an hour they identified him by "DNA". I run a large lab and this is virtually impossible. Against which database were they going to match? What samples were they using for analysis? Using what tools? This is all just so bogus. They knew who it was because they put him up to it/tracked him over there/watched him get on the roof. Doesn't this strike you as absurd?
https://www.malone.news/p/a-psywar-assassination-attempt
I am watching and listening to the Town Hall in Red Deer on X and covering a lot of good questions and panelists. Over 10,000 watching.
I wish the media would honestly cover it but it will be slammed on talk shows and newspapers.
I noticed that our membership is growing so people must be mentioning this group around. Welcome.
We have a few regular posters, but anyone can post, so if you come across something especially worth passing on, please do.
For those who may be new or who have been here for a while and never posted our group enjoys articles and other posts that provide a unique perspective and challenge the common narratives, fill in blanks, or simply entertain.
Readers 'like' some articles more than others, but 'liking' to me is more a sign that we found the article useful than that we agree with it. I often 'like' articles that i thought to be are quirky, off-base, or just plain wrong, but worth reading.
