Just got off the phone from a brief conversation with Nadine and was able to get a livestream scheduled for tomorrow evening, 6-8pm MDT about the 1905 Committee.
I’d seen from the comments as well as from emails…that some of us seem to have some concerns. I’m going to work through this list of concerns with Nadine, after giving her a full opportunity to introduce herself and talk about her efforts behind the 1905 project…
If you are on Twitter/X, YouTube or Facebook and available, you should be able to chime in with additional comments and questions…and I really hope you do.
If not…the link below will remain active after the stream is finished and you can just view here at your leisure.
https://sheldonyakiwchuk.substack.com/p/livestream-with-nadine-wellwood
Anyone know what or who this Levi paper is that it references, I don’t disbelieve it but? Tried to look it up but didn’t come up with anything. Agree science is questionable & should be, but is this paper fact I wonder??? Anyone know????
The easiest way to tell if you are talking to someone who is intellectually honest about the COVID vaccines is to ask them for their assessment of the Levi paper.
If they claim, like UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris does, that there is nothing to see here, then you are dealing with someone who is intellectual dishonest. The AI analysis of Morris’s attack on the Levi paper is absolutely devastating.
What the paper found
37% higher non-COVID mortality in people who got Pfizer.
That’s a train wreck.
There is no other way to spin this.
Possible explanations for the results:
The Pfizer/Moderna groups weren’t really matched
Moderna reduces non-COVID all-cause mortality by 37%
The problems:
They were matched. Barbra Dickerman wrote 2 papers on COVID vaccines and VA data showing that crude ...
