My phone just exploded with a loud, annoying noise, followed by an announcement in an artificial voice.
That announcement had nothing to do with me or any of the several hundred thousand (millions?) of people whose day was disrupted by it.
Apparently some white 'male' (I assume that probably that means a man and not some other male creature) is somewhere near Bearspaw with a gun.
This was of zero relevance or interest to most of those assaulted via their phones.
Why some worker bee would think that the millions of the people in the 587 and maybe 403 regiosn would care is a mystery to me. Who authorizes such abuses?
At most this incident affects probably only a very few people directly and maybe 100 or two indirectly -- if we include the police.
How the 'authorities' have the temerity to invade our lives over such a trivial matter is a mystery to me and a matter of great concern.
It seems that these people have a lot of power and very little discretion on when not to use it.
At this time of day, although most people are up and about, some are in hospitals with cell phones beside them and people who work night shift are sleeping. Others are in situations where a loud noise emitting from a phone they keep muted could reveal their presence, cost them a job, or even compromise their life and safety. In a city of millions of people and the countryside surrounding, there are very many situations that are hard to imagine, yet these people have the power to disrupt lives indiscriminately.
Incidents like this are indicative of how powerful governments and unthinking 'workers' are invading our lives daily in many different ways for no good purpose just because they can, regardless of certain and unforeseen collateral harms.
Alerts like this serve a purpose when there is a general and widespread danger such as when tornadoes are roaming the countryside, killer hail is expected, or a dam bursts, but for one guy wandering around far from most of the recipients of a message, or a child has gone missing, give us a break.
These latter small issues are daily occurrences and do not require blasting a noisy message to everyone within hundreds of miles and maybe to people on vacation out of country.
A simple text message would suffice. Most people would see it and those who think they might be affected would spread the word.
I would not object to a text message. but this is IMO is using a hammer to kill a fly.
It will never be known how much harm was done by this alert, but I am certain it was considerable. Did it do any good? We'll probably never know.
Catalyst for Civilizational Collapse
Britain’s Tories Continue to Avert Their Eyes
“No” Sure Means a Lot More Than It Used to
Institutional Betrayal
India’s Uneven Schooling System
New Romantics and How to Stop Them
Anyone know what or who this Levi paper is that it references, I don’t disbelieve it but? Tried to look it up but didn’t come up with anything. Agree science is questionable & should be, but is this paper fact I wonder??? Anyone know????
The easiest way to tell if you are talking to someone who is intellectually honest about the COVID vaccines is to ask them for their assessment of the Levi paper.
If they claim, like UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris does, that there is nothing to see here, then you are dealing with someone who is intellectual dishonest. The AI analysis of Morris’s attack on the Levi paper is absolutely devastating.
What the paper found
37% higher non-COVID mortality in people who got Pfizer.
That’s a train wreck.
There is no other way to spin this.
Possible explanations for the results:
The Pfizer/Moderna groups weren’t really matched
Moderna reduces non-COVID all-cause mortality by 37%
The problems:
They were matched. Barbra Dickerman wrote 2 papers on COVID vaccines and VA data showing that crude ...