Mark Carney, who wants to be your next prime minister, recently released his plan for Canada’s climate policies through 2035. It’s a sprawling plan (climate plans always are), encompassing industrial and manufacturing emissions, vehicle emissions, building emissions, appliance emissions, cross-border emissions, more “green” energy, more “heat pumps” replacing HVAC, more electric vehicle (EV) subsidies, more subsidies to consumers, more subsidies to companies, and more charging stations for the EV revolution that does not seem to be happening. And while the plan seeks to eliminate the “consumer carbon tax” on “fuels, such as gasoline, natural gas, diesel, home heating oil, etc.” it’s basically Trudeau’s climate plans on steroids.
Consider this. Instead of paying the “consumer carbon tax” directly, under the Carney plan Canadians will pay more—but less visibly. The plan would “tighten” (i.e. raise) the carbon tax on “large industrial emitters” (you know, the people who make the stuff you buy) who will undoubtedly pass some or all of that cost to consumers. Second, the plan wants to force those same large emitters to somehow fund subsidy programs for consumer purchases to offset the losses to Canadians currently profiting from consumer carbon tax rebates. No doubt the costs of those subsidy programs will also be folded into the costs of the products that flow from Canada’s “large industrial emitters,” but the cause of rising prices will be less visible to the general public. And the plan wants more consumer home energy audits and retrofit programs, some of the most notoriously wasteful climate policies ever developed.
But the ironic icing on this plan’s climate cake is the desire to implement tariffs (excuse me, a “carbon border adjustment mechanism”) on U.S. products in association with “key stakeholders and international partners to ensure fairness for Canadian industries.” Yes, you read that right, the plan seeks to kick off a carbon-emission tariff war with the United States, not only for Canada’s trade, but to bring in European allies to pile on. And this, all while posturing in high dudgeon over Donald Trump’s plans to impose tariffs on Canadian products based on perceived injustices in the U.S.com/Canada trade relationship.
To recap, while grudgingly admitting that the “consumer carbon tax” is wildly unpopular, poorly designed and easily dispensable in Canada’s greenhouse gas reduction efforts, the Carney plan intends to double down on all of the economically damaging climate policies of the last 10 years.
But that doubling down will be more out of sight and out of mind to Canadians. Instead of directly seeing how they pay for Canada’s climate crusade, Canadians will see prices rise for goods and services as government stamps climate mandates on Canada’s largest manufacturers and producers, and those costs trickle down onto consumer pocketbooks.
In this regard, the plan is truly old school—historically, governments and bureaucrats preferred to hide their taxes inside of obscure regulations and programs invisible to the public. Canadians will also see prices rise as tariffs imposed on imported American goods (and potentially services) force American businesses to raise prices on goods that Canadians purchase.
The Carney climate plan is a return to the hidden European-style technocratic/bureaucratic/administrative mindset that has led Canada’s economy into record underperformance. Hopefully, whether Carney becomes our next prime minister or not, this plan becomes another dead letter pack of political promises.
Here, at The Lions, everyone is welcome to post articles that seem interesting, controversial and thought provoking and/or comment on anything. Please do. Sometimes the comments are more interesting than the article.
Be sure to 'like' articles that you appreciate finding here. Liking does not mean you necessarily agree with the contents, just that it was worth seeing, and please join the polite and thoughtful conversations in the comments under articles.
Caveat emptor. This forum is not moderated. So far there has been no need. Be aware that some articles are more opinion than fact and some vice versa. Some are parody. Some are trolls. Readers are advised to use their discretion.
Did this guy miss anything??? 🤣🤣
Below is a comprehensive list of wasteful spending by the Trudeau government since 2015.
Comprehensive List of Wasteful Spending by the Trudeau Government (Since 2015)
Specific Examples of Wasteful Spending
1. Over $100,000 annually - Spent on the health minister’s X (Twitter) account, funding salaries and overtime for minimal output (Source: CBC News).
2. $250,000 - For a giant rubber duck during Canada 150 celebrations, criticized as a frivolous gimmick (Source: The Globe and Mail).
3. $669,650 - Paid to KPMG for cost-saving advice, seen as ironic and redundant given their expertise (Source: National Post).
4. $52.89 million - Aid to Venezuela in 2019, controversial due to the regime’s human rights record (Source: National Post).
5. $85 flashlights, $78 pens - Overpriced promotional items, reflecting poor procurement oversight (Source: The Post Millennial).
6. $32 billion - Potential overpayments for COVID-19 benefits due to inadequate verification (Source: BNN Bloomberg).
7. **Undisclosed ...
I'm in.
Recently, Brian Lilley of the Toronto Sun interviewed Steve Bannon about Donald Trump’s repeated comments about Canada becoming the fifty-first state. Bannon has long been associated with Trump, having served as his White House Chief Strategist in 2017, and continues to be a leading spokesman and organizer for the MAGA movement.
Lilley was probably hoping to get assurances that Trump’s comments about Canada were not serious and that he was just trolling Justin Trudeau. But that was not the message he received.
Instead, Bannon’s responses focused largely on the geostrategic and geoeconomic benefits of “hemispheric defense.” In short, Trump’s comments about buying Greenland and taking back the Panama Canal are part of a grand strategy of defending the Western Hemisphere. Canada is a key element of that policy.
According to Bannon, President Trump has decided on a plan that ...