People use terms like Net Zero confidrently, but do they realy know what they mean. Such terms are shorthand for complex ideas that most people do not research.
Alberta's current premier has been using the term quite a bit and as if it's an admirable goal , so I thought I'd ask Perplexity for an overview. This query took Deep Research a lot longer than a lot of other questions. Maybe it's not all that simple? Is it possible that those promoting this scheme are counting on people following along without knowing where they're going?
I asked Perplexity about it and I was surprised to find that the **** is piled much deeper than I thought it was. The climate bullies have gotten to my favorite robot too.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/what-is-net-zero-fCSPxXFiSraPSCYd0zRCRQ
Anyone know what or who this Levi paper is that it references, I don’t disbelieve it but? Tried to look it up but didn’t come up with anything. Agree science is questionable & should be, but is this paper fact I wonder??? Anyone know????
The easiest way to tell if you are talking to someone who is intellectually honest about the COVID vaccines is to ask them for their assessment of the Levi paper.
If they claim, like UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris does, that there is nothing to see here, then you are dealing with someone who is intellectual dishonest. The AI analysis of Morris’s attack on the Levi paper is absolutely devastating.
What the paper found
37% higher non-COVID mortality in people who got Pfizer.
That’s a train wreck.
There is no other way to spin this.
Possible explanations for the results:
The Pfizer/Moderna groups weren’t really matched
Moderna reduces non-COVID all-cause mortality by 37%
The problems:
They were matched. Barbra Dickerman wrote 2 papers on COVID vaccines and VA data showing that crude ...
