UN Climate Summit blocks Rebel News — again
Sheila Gunn Reid discusses how the United Nations refused to allow Rebel News into its climate change conference in Brazil despite an email claiming Rebel News was accredited.
The United Nations climate conference in Belém, Brazil, is underway — and, in true UN fashion, it took all of ten minutes for the hypocrisy to hit us in the face.
For the first time in nine years, Rebel News was officially accredited to enter the conference grounds. We got the approval emails. We got our work visas. We flew half way around the world. We went to pick up our badges. Then the bureaucrats did what UN bureaucrats always do when a climate heretic gets too close: they found a problem.
Suddenly, our accreditation “didn’t allow” us inside the main venue — the pavilions, media rooms, and meeting halls packed with activists, diplomats, and 55,000 carbon-burning delegates who flew halfway around the world to lecture ordinary people about their energy use.
But somehow, we were welcome to attend the leaders’ summit that happened two weeks ago. Convenient.
This isn’t new. In 2016, the Canadian delegation meddled with our accreditation after we asked skeptical questions. The UN banned us for nine years, a ban that still hasn’t been lifted, no matter how many hoops we jump through.
Apparently, Article 19 of the UN’s own Declaration of Human Rights — the guarantee of free expression and free press — doesn’t apply to journalists who don’t think taxes can control the weather or who point out that cities like Belém have more immediate crises than “climate change,” such as raw sewage running through the Amazon rainforest.
We’re here because someone has to show the side of the UN climate change conference the regime media won’t: the private jets, the idling limos, and now the floating hotels bobbing in raw sewage.
FULL REPORT by @SheilaGunnReid: https://t.co/zTI7FqYVmE
— Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) November 16, 2025
This year, the UN is rolling out something even more brazen: the Global Declaration for Information Integrity on Climate Change.
It’s a political document telling governments, NGOs, funders, academics, and media to:
crack down on so-called climate ‘misinformation’
combat ‘denialism’
target online speech they don’t like
steer funding only toward UN-approved narratives
Sound familiar? Canada already has anti-oil “greenwashing” laws that punish companies for talking about emissions reductions. The same mindset is now being globalized, with journalists like us clearly in their crosshairs.
This is the first time a UN climate conference has openly promoted a plan to police information. They want governments to label dissent as “denialism,” regulate speech, and silence reporters who dare challenge the orthodoxy. That's me.
And wouldn’t you know it — Belém is already enforcing this shiny new censorship regime before the ink is even dry.
The hypocrisy is on full display.
While they shut out skeptical journalists, the UN’s 55,000-delegate circus burns emissions equivalent to 9,000 Canadians heating their homes for a year.
Flights, private jets, idling limos, and an air-conditioned venue so cold you could hang meat all to scold the rest of us for our “carbon footprint.”
Meanwhile, the people of Belém struggle with sanitation, safety, and basic infrastructure — problems that the billions spent on climate summits never seem to fix.
We travelled thousands of kilometres, endured two red-eyes, the Brazilian heat, and a labyrinth of UN bureaucracy because telling the other side of the story matters. And no UN official, no Canadian diplomat, and no censorship declaration is going to shut us up.
We’ve done this independent journalism from the outside before. We’ll do it again.
This is the official gathering of the hypocrites — and we’re here to expose it.
Berta Dad nailed it. Copied from FB.
Jeff Rath’s behaviour toward Danielle Smith is not a good look for this movement, and he does not speak for me.
When this started, I had respect for him. But as this has played out, it has become harder to ignore what appears to be a push for power inside the movement, not a sincere focus on Alberta independence.
Danielle Smith is a major reason Albertans were even able to collect signatures in the first place. Compared to any other premier in this country, I believe she has been the strongest one standing up for her province.
I will not forget her accomplishments.
She stood up for parental rights when others wanted schools keeping parents in the dark.
She took action against political ideology being pushed in classrooms.
She made sure kids got back to school when the system tried to hold families hostage.
She has strengthened Alberta Sheriffs and continued exploring ways to free Alberta from relying on the RCMP.
And that is only part of it.
This ...
WEF/UN/Globalists have proven they can’t be trusted now given the key to Canada. Are you awake yet Canadians??
REPORT: UN Climate Scientists Flip on the Climate Doomsday Narrative | Stand on Guard CLIP
WATCH Have they been lying about climate change this whole time? Are they cancelling climate change doomsday scenario for the data centers?
The UN climate scientists admit the high emission doomsday scenarios were overblown. UN climate change scientists flip: climate change not too bad anymore according to a new report. No doomsday on the horizon.
On this Stand on Guard clip, we question why the UN might be backtracking on previous dire predictions, suggesting a new agenda at play. We examine how this shift could be tied to the proliferation of data center construction and the increasing demands on our power grid from artificial intelligence. It's crucial to consider the broader implications for our communities and hold big tech accountable.
Thank you to @jimmy_dore for pointing out this...
Listening to Ganum today on the meeting that Premier Smith is having with Lukasek I am wondering why not just have his referendum on the vote in October? If enough say no to his question isn't it the same as a referendum that the other side wants? I for one want this to wake up the East and don't care how it happens. Another caller said she needs to call an provincial election in October and take the rest of questions off the ballot - this could be risky but I am leaning toward it as terrified that the NDP will get in again and right now Nemshi is their handicap IMHO.
