Carney is so far offside (to use a hockey metaphor) he is not even on the ice, and he has no clue what the game is or where the puck is.
Here's just an excerpt from today's C and C
Consider how brilliant and audacious this strategy was. Trump isn’t bothering to reform the UN. He’s not even pulling the US out of the main body, where we need to stay on the Security Council to make sure nothing goes sideways. (And it’s easier to kill the UN from inside anyway.)
Instead, Trump said, “I’ll just make a new United Nations.”
🔥 The implications are staggering. Trump stands poised to kill the UN softly. For just one example, imagine if the US, from its position on the Security Council, simply vetoes all ‘peacekeeping’ missions unless they are routed through his new Board of Peace. The argument makes itself— UN peacekeeping missions usually fail, the UN is too often deadlocked in voting paralysis, and it is fantastically expensive compared to what it actually accomplishes. So, the argument would go, let’s give the job to someone who knows how to broker peace efficiently.
Someone like President Trump! After all, he just ended eight wars —the Gaza ceasefire, DRC-Rwanda, Armenia-Azerbaijan, India-Pakistan, etc.— in one year.
Think about it. Trump’s peacemaking deals last year now look more like strategic preplanning— a ‘proof of concept’ justifying a UN replacement, not merely ‘lobbying for a Nobel prize.’ Everybody bought the idea that Trump actually cared about the stupid Nobel prize, and it was just a head fake the whole time.
Now cast your mind back to Trump’s last speech at the UN in September. He told the General Assembly how he’d made more peace in one year than they had in forty. He lambasted the UN for offering “little help,” and asked rhetorically, “What is the purpose of the United Nations?”
He was setting it all up.
The evidence isn’t just the Board of Peace and Trump’s speech. Remember how, on January 7th, Trump signed a presidential memo withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international organizations, conventions, and treaties deemed “contrary to U.S. interests?” They included 31 UN-affiliated entities (e.g., UN Population Fund, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change) and 35 non-UN multilateral bodies (e.g., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—IPCC, Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research). Boom.
Meanwhile, President Trump’s adversaries lie docile and powerless —unable to even effectively complain (see, e.g., Mark Carney)— cowering like toads ‘neath the harrow, in perpetual fear of the ever-present threat posed by the tariff dashboard’s glittering deterrance.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/hit-by-the-peace-board-friday-january
Berta Dad nailed it. Copied from FB.
Jeff Rath’s behaviour toward Danielle Smith is not a good look for this movement, and he does not speak for me.
When this started, I had respect for him. But as this has played out, it has become harder to ignore what appears to be a push for power inside the movement, not a sincere focus on Alberta independence.
Danielle Smith is a major reason Albertans were even able to collect signatures in the first place. Compared to any other premier in this country, I believe she has been the strongest one standing up for her province.
I will not forget her accomplishments.
She stood up for parental rights when others wanted schools keeping parents in the dark.
She took action against political ideology being pushed in classrooms.
She made sure kids got back to school when the system tried to hold families hostage.
She has strengthened Alberta Sheriffs and continued exploring ways to free Alberta from relying on the RCMP.
And that is only part of it.
This ...
WEF/UN/Globalists have proven they can’t be trusted now given the key to Canada. Are you awake yet Canadians??
REPORT: UN Climate Scientists Flip on the Climate Doomsday Narrative | Stand on Guard CLIP
WATCH Have they been lying about climate change this whole time? Are they cancelling climate change doomsday scenario for the data centers?
The UN climate scientists admit the high emission doomsday scenarios were overblown. UN climate change scientists flip: climate change not too bad anymore according to a new report. No doomsday on the horizon.
On this Stand on Guard clip, we question why the UN might be backtracking on previous dire predictions, suggesting a new agenda at play. We examine how this shift could be tied to the proliferation of data center construction and the increasing demands on our power grid from artificial intelligence. It's crucial to consider the broader implications for our communities and hold big tech accountable.
Thank you to @jimmy_dore for pointing out this...
Listening to Ganum today on the meeting that Premier Smith is having with Lukasek I am wondering why not just have his referendum on the vote in October? If enough say no to his question isn't it the same as a referendum that the other side wants? I for one want this to wake up the East and don't care how it happens. Another caller said she needs to call an provincial election in October and take the rest of questions off the ballot - this could be risky but I am leaning toward it as terrified that the NDP will get in again and right now Nemshi is their handicap IMHO.
