New Climate Study Debunks Key UN IPCC Dogma
Breaking research reveals the key metric behind so-called global warming is based on “physically meaningless” calculations. If true, it could upend decades of climate science and policy.
https://libertysentinel.substack.com/p/new-climate-study-debunks-key-un
title&publication_id=1434665&post_id=192153677
A comment below the article: Whilst there have not been crazy temperature changes the past 150 years, there is such a thing as climate change. And we know this because . . . we are no longer in the big ice age. There have been wild climate swings the past 1,000 years. The period of [approximately] 950 a.d. to 1250 a.d. was known as the Medieval Warming period. The earth’s average temperature was incredibly high. The Medieval Warming Period was immediately followed by The Little Ice Age [approximately 1300-1850] when temperatures were brutally cold [think of the winter of Valley Forge in 1777-1778]. Just 27 years after the Little Ice Age ended, the U.S. Experienced a season of no winter [1877-1878]. The Summer of Hell in 1980 saw the Midwest hit with 17-STRAIGHT DAYS of temperatures over 100 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s true climate change. And - it just happens.
Mankind nor carbon have had any impact on any of the earth’s 5 mass extinctions, the one-billion continuous years when earth‘s atmosphere was so toxic nothing lived on earth, or any other cataclysmic event. People need to stop having negative fantasies about humans impacting climate. Weather is an entirely different matter, and humans have been able to impact weather events for decades now.
Just look at history. All you see is climate change.
On FB very well said…..
I had a conversation in person recently that pretty much sums up the Canadian political divide right now. Not the cartoon version from the news... the quiet, everyday one we've all had with friends, or family.
It started predictably of course. The usual labels tossed out like confetti (xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, bigot, Maple Maga). Because apparently if you question a policy, you must secretly hate the group it’s supposed to help.
And this little exchange laid it out for me.
For a lot of modern liberals, politics seems to be less about what actually happens and more about looking compassionate. Slap the right moral sticker on a policy "help the marginalized! Expand programs! Signal virtue!" and you're golden.
Ask whether it works in practice? Ahhh... suddenly you’re the bad guy with a heart of stone.
Their world is simple... you’re either “for people” or “against people.” Intentions are everything and results are optional.
In that framework, a policy ...
Carney got his hands on the CPP somehow !
The Canada Pension Plan Investments Board (CPPIB) and Brookfield on Tuesday launched a $50 billion “Maple Fund” that they say will funnel capital towards critical infrastructure and strategic industries across Canada.
The announcement from the CPPIB, which manages the investments in the Canada Pension Plan, and investment management firm Brookfield was one of the main funding projects that came out from a recent two-day investment summit hosted by Carney and the premiers.
With the Canada Pension Plan playing a central role in many Canadians’ retirement planning, many may be wondering what this decision means for their retirements.
What is the Maple Fund?
The Maple Fund will operate as an investing framework to provide funding for specific projects, and will include up to $25 billion each from the CPPIB and Brookfield over a five-year timespan.
The fund is focused on complex large-scale projects that each require significant upfront resources and development capabilities, and a ...
Copy it, read it & send to the federal government!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17oUkTCKTO-s2CYdKN1YLs9hRouRBe6PrnINCjrxG-n8/edit?tab=t.0
