The Lions
Politics • Culture • Education
A group of friends with mostly centrist or conservative viewpoints who share resources and ideas about the governance of Alberta and Canada and about world events and trends.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
March 27, 2026

Calgary forced citizens to sign a DEI pledge just to speak at City Hall

Before Calgarians could address their own council, they had to acknowledge an ideology — and that should alarm every Canadian.

https://www.westernstandard.news/calgary/thomas-calgary-forced-citizens-to-sign-a-dei-pledge-just-to-speak-at-city-hall/72263

Calgarians who signed up to speak to city council during the blanket upzoning public hearing were forced to also sign a statement on truth and reconciliation, anti-racism, diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging.

The statement reads, “The purpose of the City of Calgary is to make life better every day. To fully realize our purpose, we are committed to addressing racism and other forms of discrimination within our programs, policies, and services and eliminating barriers that impact the lives of Indigenous, racialized, and other marginalized people.”

"It is expected that participants will behave respectfully and treat everyone with dignity and respect to allow for conversations free from bias and prejudice.”

Participants acknowledge they have read and understand the statement, then add their signature.

The policy goes back to 2021 when then councillor Jyoti Gondek put forward a motion to develop the statement for members of the public to sign when they register for public hearings.

This is wrong in so many ways; one wonders where to start.

Is it even legal or enforceable to force someone to sign a statement acknowledging an ideology they may not agree with or believe in?

Obviously, the City of Calgary has no respect for Calgarians’ ability to express opinions without taking off on a rant against someone or something during public hearings.

To be clear, the city has not kept it a secret.

There are reams of documents about the program to which a great deal of resources have obviously been dedicated, and can be revealed by an AI search.

This is an internal staff awareness component, including ‘Anti-racism 101’ that trains city hall staff on systemic racism and racial discrimination, designed to guide employee awareness and behaviour.

There is an equity, inclusion, and belonging framework training that applies to all staff, with an emphasis on bias reduction and equitable systems, employee participation, and belonging.

The Respectful Workplace Policy, again mandatory for all staff to take training on, details how to avoid harassment, discrimination, and understand workplace conduct expectations.

There is mandatory and recurring staff training tied to DEI and respect, including a code of conduct training and respectful workplace training.

The Calgary Police Service and Fire Department get special training covering inclusion, psychological safety, bias awareness, and inclusive culture.

There are more programs and documents approved by the previous council, and over the course of its tenure, the most vocal supporters of anti-racism/DEI were Mayor Gondek, Cllrs. Walcott, Spencer, and Penner.

Councillors who expressed concerns and skepticism were led by the most vocal Cllr. McLean and included Cllrs. Chu, Wong, and Chabot.

I know you want to know how much all this is costing, but an exact figure is hard to find because there isn't a ‘DEI’ line in the city’s budget. My AI search estimated it to be in the millions of dollars.

There could be an argument that the city is within its rights to define its workplace culture; there could also be a counterargument that the city is a public, not private organization. Those arguments were heard in council and should be revisited.

However, forcing Calgarians to sign this document is beyond the pale.

Before participating in a public hearing, which is a protected democratic process under Alberta law, they must first acknowledge that a government-written, ideologically framed statement is wrong.

Once government access becomes conditional, it is no longer a true democracy.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Posts

Berta Dad nailed it. Copied from FB.
Jeff Rath’s behaviour toward Danielle Smith is not a good look for this movement, and he does not speak for me.
When this started, I had respect for him. But as this has played out, it has become harder to ignore what appears to be a push for power inside the movement, not a sincere focus on Alberta independence.
Danielle Smith is a major reason Albertans were even able to collect signatures in the first place. Compared to any other premier in this country, I believe she has been the strongest one standing up for her province.
I will not forget her accomplishments.
She stood up for parental rights when others wanted schools keeping parents in the dark.
She took action against political ideology being pushed in classrooms.
She made sure kids got back to school when the system tried to hold families hostage.
She has strengthened Alberta Sheriffs and continued exploring ways to free Alberta from relying on the RCMP.
And that is only part of it.
This ...

11 hours ago

WEF/UN/Globalists have proven they can’t be trusted now given the key to Canada. Are you awake yet Canadians??

REPORT: UN Climate Scientists Flip on the Climate Doomsday Narrative | Stand on Guard CLIP

WATCH Have they been lying about climate change this whole time? Are they cancelling climate change doomsday scenario for the data centers?

The UN climate scientists admit the high emission doomsday scenarios were overblown. UN climate change scientists flip: climate change not too bad anymore according to a new report. No doomsday on the horizon.

On this Stand on Guard clip, we question why the UN might be backtracking on previous dire predictions, suggesting a new agenda at play. We examine how this shift could be tied to the proliferation of data center construction and the increasing demands on our power grid from artificial intelligence. It's crucial to consider the broader implications for our communities and hold big tech accountable.

Thank you to @jimmy_dore for pointing out this...

post photo preview

Listening to Ganum today on the meeting that Premier Smith is having with Lukasek I am wondering why not just have his referendum on the vote in October? If enough say no to his question isn't it the same as a referendum that the other side wants? I for one want this to wake up the East and don't care how it happens. Another caller said she needs to call an provincial election in October and take the rest of questions off the ballot - this could be risky but I am leaning toward it as terrified that the NDP will get in again and right now Nemshi is their handicap IMHO.

Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals